How Sacubitril/Valsartan (Entresto) Works: neprilysin inhibition plus RAAS (angiotensin II) blockade; Evidence & Clinical Applications.
Last updated:
March 2026
•
Powered by
Elicit’s AI Research Agent

Quick Summary
Sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto) is an angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) used for heart failure. Sacubitril inhibits neprilysin, preventing breakdown of natriuretic peptides and prolonging their favorable effects, while valsartan blocks the RAAS system. This dual mechanism supports natriuresis/vasodilation and RAAS blockade and is used to reduce cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure.
Properties
Details
Generic Name
sacubitril/valsartan
Brand Names
Entresto
Drug Class
Angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI)
Primary Target
Neprilysin (MME) / angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AGTR1)
Approved Indications
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, NYHA class II–IV) to reduce cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure
Development History
Sacubitril/valsartan was developed by Novartis as a first-in-class angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), designated internally as LCZ696. The molecule emerged from a decades-long effort to exploit neprilysin inhibition therapeutically — a strategy that had previously failed with omapatrilat, a combined ACE inhibitor–neprilysin inhibitor abandoned due to angioedema attributable to simultaneous suppression of bradykinin degradation via ACE inhibition and neprilysin inhibition. Novartis solved this by pairing sacubitril — a neprilysin-inhibitor prodrug (converted in vivo to the active moiety LBQ657) — with valsartan, an angiotensin II type-1 receptor blocker, co-crystallized in a 1:1 molar ratio as a sodium supramolecular complex. Substituting an ARB for the ACE inhibitor component preserved AT1-receptor blockade while removing the bradykinin-potentiating pathway responsible for omapatrilat's angioedema signal. The resulting dual mechanism — RAAS suppression plus natriuretic peptide augmentation through neprilysin inhibition — was designed to address the neurohormonal dysregulation underlying heart failure with reduced ejection fraction more completely than RAAS blockade alone.
The pivotal approval program was the PARADIGM-HF trial (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure), a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial enrolling 8,442 patients with HFrEF across 47 countries, comparing sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg twice daily against enalapril 10 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint — a composite of cardiovascular death or first hospitalization for heart failure — occurred in 21.8% of the sacubitril/valsartan group versus 26.5% with enalapril (HR 0.80; p<0.001), representing a 20% relative risk reduction. All-cause mortality was reduced by 16%. The trial was stopped early at a median follow-up of 27 months owing to the magnitude of benefit. Based on these results, the FDA granted approval on July 7, 2015 for sacubitril/valsartan — marketed as Entresto — to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure in patients with chronic HFrEF (NYHA class II–IV). The EMA followed with approval in November 2015 under the same brand name.
The original HFrEF label was subsequently broadened following evidence from two additional programs. The PIONEER-HF trial evaluated sacubitril/valsartan initiated in-hospital after hemodynamic stabilization in acute HF, demonstrating a 29% reduction in rehospitalization for heart failure versus enalapril and supporting in-hospital initiation strategies. The pivotal label expansion came from PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ARB Global Outcomes in HF with Preserved Ejection Fraction), which enrolled patients with HFpEF (LVEF ≥45%) and compared sacubitril/valsartan against valsartan alone; the trial narrowly missed its primary endpoint overall, but subgroup analyses showed efficacy in patients with mildly reduced or below-normal LVEF. The FDA used this continuous LVEF analysis to issue a label expansion in February 2021, broadening the indication to adults with chronic heart failure whose "LVEF is below normal" — effectively extending coverage to HFmrEF and a substantial portion of the HFpEF spectrum. As of 2025, Entresto's current US label covers adults with chronic heart failure in whom benefits are most clearly evident below normal ejection fraction, with the prescribing guidance explicitly leaving threshold determination to clinical judgment rather than a fixed LVEF cutoff.
Detailed Mechanism of Action
Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) is a supramolecular sodium complex that delivers three pharmacologically active analytes after oral ingestion. Sacubitril, a prodrug, is rapidly cleaved by esterases to the active neprilysin inhibitor sacubitrilat (LBQ657), reaching peak plasma concentrations within approximately 1.5–2 hours. Valsartan, the angiotensin receptor blocker component, reaches peak concentrations within 2–3 hours. Both moieties distribute extensively into cardiac, renal, and vascular tissues — the sites where their complementary targets reside.
Neprilysin inhibition by sacubitrilat. Neprilysin (neutral endopeptidase 24.11; NEP) is a membrane-bound zinc metalloprotease that cleaves a broad array of vasoactive peptides, with susceptibility to degradation greatest for CNP > ANP > BNP. Sacubitrilat binds to the enzyme's active site and blocks this proteolytic activity. The immediate consequence is an accumulation of the intact natriuretic peptides ANP, BNP, and CNP in the circulation and in cardiac and renal tissues. Beyond natriuretic peptides, NEP also degrades bradykinin, substance P, and adrenomedullin; inhibition of neprilysin therefore simultaneously raises circulating levels of these vasodilator peptides alongside the natriuretic peptides, contributing to the drug's overall hemodynamic effect.
Natriuretic peptide receptor activation and cGMP signaling. Accumulated ANP and BNP bind to natriuretic peptide receptor-A (NPR-A, a membrane-bound guanylyl cyclase), while CNP engages NPR-B. Ligand binding activates the intrinsic guanylyl cyclase domain, synthesizing the second messenger cyclic 3′,5′-guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) across a wide variety of tissues and cell types. Elevated intracellular cGMP activates cGMP-dependent protein kinase G (PKG), which phosphorylates numerous downstream substrates. In vascular smooth muscle, PKG-mediated phosphorylation of RhoA at Ser188 suppresses RhoA/ROCK-driven cytoskeletal contraction and fibrogenic signaling, directly mediating vasodilation and anti-fibrotic effects. In the kidney, PKG activation increases glomerular filtration rate, promotes natriuresis, and drives diuresis by modulating tubular sodium handling.
Anti-remodeling and anti-fibrotic signaling. In cardiomyocytes, the cGMP–PKG axis phosphorylates the regulator of G-protein signaling subtype 4 (RGS4), thereby blunting Gαq signaling downstream of the AT1 receptor and inhibiting activation of transient receptor potential C6 (TRPC6) — two pathways that otherwise drive pathological hypertrophy and calcium overload. PKG also attenuates genomic actions of the cardiac mineralocorticoid receptor, reducing aldosterone-driven fibrotic gene expression. CNP, acting through NPR-B in cardiac fibroblasts, provides an additional anti-fibrotic brake: paracrine CNP/GC-B/cGMP signaling in cardiac fibroblasts directly opposes TGF-β– and angiotensin II–driven collagen deposition and myofibroblast differentiation. Consistent with these mechanisms, clinical data from HFrEF patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan show significant reductions in serum markers of collagen synthesis (PINP and PIIINP) that correlate with echocardiographic reverse remodeling.
AT1 receptor blockade by valsartan. Valsartan acts at a distinct molecular target, selectively and competitively blocking the angiotensin II type-1 receptor (AT1R). Because neprilysin also cleaves angiotensin I and II, sacubitrilat inhibition raises circulating angiotensin II — a pharmacological rationale that makes concurrent AT1R blockade essential. Valsartan's AT1R blockade prevents angiotensin II–mediated vasoconstriction, aldosterone secretion, and sympathetic activation. In the Val-HeFT trial, AT1R blockade with valsartan produced a sustained 17.4% reduction in plasma aldosterone sustained over two years in patients with heart failure, translating to reduced sodium retention and attenuated profibrotic aldosterone signaling. Valsartan's displacement of angiotensin II from AT1Rs also redistributs angiotensin II toward the AT2 receptor, which activates counter-regulatory vasodilatory and antiapoptotic pathways.
Parallel substrates and broader effects. Sacubitrilat-mediated NEP inhibition also prevents breakdown of adrenomedullin and substance P, contributing to additional vasodilation and possible cardioprotective effects. These non-natriuretic-peptide substrates — bradykinin, substance P, and adrenomedullin — may contribute meaningfully to sacubitril/valsartan's efficacy beyond natriuretic peptide augmentation alone. Mechanistic studies in HFrEF patients also reveal that sacubitril/valsartan downregulates miR-425 and miR1-3p, restoring proANP processing and increasing levels of multiple proANP-derived bioactive peptides by mechanisms beyond direct NEP inhibition.
The clinical translation of these converging molecular events was demonstrated in PARADIGM-HF, where the dual mechanism — enhanced natriuretic peptide signaling plus RAAS suppression — reduced cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization by 20% and all-cause mortality by 16% compared with enalapril. This dual action addresses two principal pathophysiological drivers of heart failure: chronic activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and attenuated sensitivity to natriuretic peptides — a combination that produces greater neurohormonal modulation than either mechanism alone can achieve.
Clinical Relevance
Approved Indications
Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF): Sacubitril/valsartan reduced cardiovascular death and heart-failure hospitalization by 20% reduction in cardiovascular death and heart-failure hospitalization versus enalapril in PARADIGM-HF, establishing it as first-in-class ARNI therapy for symptomatic HFrEF (NYHA II–IV).
Guideline-Directed First-Line ARNI Therapy: The 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline gives a class I recommendation to replace ACE inhibitors or ARBs with an ARNI in patients with chronic symptomatic HFrEF who are tolerating an ACEi or ARB.
Key Drug Interactions (Mechanism-Based)
ACE Inhibitors / Angioedema: Neprilysin inhibition raises bradykinin and substance P, compounding ACEi effects; a mandatory 36-hour washout from any ACE inhibitor is required before initiation to reduce angioedema risk.
Potassium-Sparing Diuretics / Hyperkalemia: The valsartan component blocks aldosterone-mediated potassium excretion; co-administration with spironolactone or eplerenone requires close monitoring of serum potassium.
NSAIDs / Renal Impairment: NSAIDs blunt prostaglandin-mediated renal vasodilation while RAAS blockade reduces efferent arteriolar tone, compounding the risk of acute kidney injury in volume-depleted patients.
Contraindications
Pregnancy (Black Box Warning): RAAS blockade in the second and third trimesters causes fetal renal failure, oligohydramnios, and death; sacubitril/valsartan must be discontinued as soon as pregnancy is detected.
History of Angioedema: Dual neprilysin/RAAS inhibition synergistically elevates vasoactive peptides; patients with prior ACEi- or ARB-associated angioedema are contraindicated in patients with prior ACEi- or ARB-associated angioedema.
Emerging Indications
Oncology
Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity (Phase 2, positive): Neprilysin inhibition raises endogenous natriuretic peptides while AT1 blockade dampens RAAS-driven oxidative injury, addressing two mechanisms implicated in anthracycline cardiomyopathy. In the SARAH trial (n=114 with elevated hs-cTnI during chemotherapy), 6 months of sacubitril/valsartan reduced the incidence of a >15% global longitudinal strain decline to 7% versus 25% on placebo (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.75; P=0.015). A larger Phase 4 confirmatory study, MAINSTREAM (NCT05465031, target n≈480), is recruiting Polish breast cancer patients to test prevention of a ≥5% LVEF drop at 24 months.
Primary cardioprotection during adjuvant breast cancer therapy (Phase 2, negative on primary): Same neprilysin/AT1 rationale, applied prophylactically irrespective of troponin status. In PRADA II (n=138), 18 months of sacubitril/valsartan did not significantly attenuate the CMR-measured LVEF decline versus placebo (between-group difference 1.1 percentage points, 95% CI -0.4 to 2.7; P=0.16), although global longitudinal strain and NT-proBNP/troponin I trajectories favored active treatment (NCT03760588).
Cardiology
Acute myocardial infarction without prior heart failure (Phase 3, failed primary): Neprilysin inhibition was hypothesized to limit adverse post-infarct remodeling beyond what ACE inhibition achieves. In PARADISE-MI (n=5,661 with reduced LVEF and/or pulmonary congestion after MI), sacubitril/valsartan did not significantly reduce the composite of cardiovascular death or incident heart failure versus ramipril over a median 22 months (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.78-1.04; P=0.17) (NCT02924727).
Resistant hypertension (Phase 3, exploratory): Combined neprilysin inhibition and AT1 blockade lowers central aortic pressure and arterial stiffness beyond ARB monotherapy. A 2025 Phase 3 trial in 80 predominantly Afro-descendant patients reported BP control (<140/90) in 94.9% on sacubitril/valsartan versus 69.2% on optimized ARB/ACEi (P=0.03). The earlier PARAMETER study (n=454, elderly systolic hypertension) showed a 3.7 mmHg greater reduction in central aortic systolic pressure versus olmesartan at 12 weeks.
Nephrology
Chronic kidney disease without heart failure (Phase 2, neutral on primary): Augmenting natriuretic peptide tone may slow CKD progression by reducing intraglomerular pressure and pro-fibrotic signaling. In the UK HARP-III trial (n=414, eGFR 20-60 mL/min/1.73 m²), 12-month measured GFR was identical between arms (29.8 vs 29.9 mL/min/1.73 m²; difference −0.1), but sacubitril/valsartan additionally lowered systolic BP by 5.4 mmHg and reduced NT-proBNP and troponin I by 18% and 16%, respectively, versus irbesartan.
Endocrinology / Metabolic
Hypertension with type 2 diabetic nephropathy (Phase 4, ongoing): Dual RAAS blockade with enhanced natriuretic peptide signaling may improve renoprotection and ambulatory BP control in patients with comorbid diabetes and CKD. The NCT06501651 multicenter trial is randomizing 297 patients with essential hypertension and type 2 diabetic nephropathy 2:1 to sacubitril/valsartan versus valsartan, with change in 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP at 12 weeks as the primary endpoint.
Clinical Trials of Sacubitril/Valsartan
Phase Design
N Enrolled
Intervention
Indication
Primary Endpoint
Key Result
Status
Trial data synthesized by Elicit's AI research agent from peer-reviewed publications and ClinicalTrials.gov filings.
Sacubitril/Valsartan Competitive Landscape
This table shows how Sacubitril/Valsartan compares to other heart failure medications across major drug classes. Each entry breaks down the representative drugs, their molecular targets, and how they actually work in the body.
Drug Class
Representative Drug(s)
Primary Molecular Target
Mechanism of Action
Key Efficacy Outcomes
Route & Dosing
Safety / Risk Profile
Key Limitations
Competitive landscape synthesized by Elicit's AI research agent from peer-reviewed pharmacology literature and regulatory filings.
Open Research Questions
Why does the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan attenuate across the ejection fraction spectrum, and which HFpEF phenotypes still derive benefit?
PARAGON-HF narrowly missed its primary endpoint and prompted ongoing work to identify the patients above 40% EF who actually respond. Recent analyses suggest the signal is concentrated in patients with lower-range EF, acute-on-chronic presentations, and elevated NT-proBNP, but the mechanistic basis for the EF-dependent gradient - including the contributions of sex, fibrosis, and atrial myopathy - remains unresolved and is being probed in subgroup analyses such as de novo versus acute-on-chronic HFpEF/HFmrEF.
To what extent does long-term neprilysin inhibition affect amyloid-β clearance and dementia risk?
Because neprilysin degrades amyloid-β, a theoretical Alzheimer's signal has shadowed the drug since approval and PARAGON-HF cognitive substudies were reassuring but underpowered for late events. A 2024 clinical update concludes that current evidence does not support an increased Alzheimer's risk but cannot exclude one over longer exposure, leaving the question open pending dedicated neuroimaging and biomarker cohorts.
What is the optimal timing for initiating sacubitril/valsartan during or shortly after an acute decompensation, and does in-hospital start improve hard outcomes?
Earlier exposure could accelerate reverse remodeling but raises hypotension and renal concerns. The PREMIER trial showed greater NT-proBNP reduction with in-hospital ARNI initiation in acute heart failure, and follow-up echocardiographic work links early start to superior left ventricular reverse remodeling, but adequately powered mortality and rehospitalization data for hospital-initiated therapy are still lacking.
How can the discordance between PARADISE-MI and post-MI remodeling studies be reconciled, and which post-MI subgroups benefit?
PARADISE-MI did not show a significant reduction in cardiovascular death or incident heart failure versus ramipril, yet imaging-based meta-analyses report improved left ventricular remodeling after primary PCI with sacubitril/valsartan. Whether this remodeling signal translates into clinical benefit in specific high-risk strata - anterior MI, severe mitral regurgitation, or markedly reduced EF - is a focus of ongoing analyses.
Does the substantial real-world gap in target-dose attainment compromise outcomes, and is a tailored low-dose strategy non-inferior?
Registries consistently show that only a minority of HFrEF patients reach the 97/103 mg twice-daily target. A 2025 mini-review highlights that 15-25% of patients achieve target doses in clinical practice and argues for prospective trials testing individualized dosing against guideline targets, since current evidence cannot distinguish dose-response from confounding by frailty and hemodynamic intolerance.
Research Sacubitril/Valsartan with Elicit — Free
This mechanism of action page was generated using Elicit's AI research agent, which synthesizes explanations from peer-reviewed pharmacology literature. Every pathway description and citation is traceable — because in pharmacology, accuracy isn't optional.
Try these searches on Elicit:
Try now
